🔗 Share this article

Prosecutors have labeled it as one of the largest frauds of its nature in the UK.

Altogether 14 people have been convicted for their part in a £28 million scheme to swindle more than 3,500 vacation property investors.

The affected individuals were eager to terminate age-old vacation property deals and tried to find help.

The majority were aged between 60 and 80. More than 500 of them surrendered over £10,000, and a single victim handed over more than £80,000.

Those affected were subjected to aggressive sales meetings extending for six hours. They were out of money, owning useless fake "rewards" and remained locked into high-priced vacation property deals they could no longer use.

The Company At the Heart of the Fraud

The firm at the heart of the fraud was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They accepted people's money to finance the directors' opulent way of life of private schools, luxury homes and personal aircraft.

The individual at the top of the organization, the main defendant, was sentenced to a seven and a half year jail time in January for deceptive scheme.

In the latest development, his wife one of the co-defendants was one of the final three to receive sentencing.

She received a 24-month deferred imprisonment at Southwark Crown Court after pleading guilty to money laundering.

This has been a extended wait and signifies a significant success for the individuals who testified, the authorities and prosecutors.

The Way the Probe Started

I first heard about the firm came in the that particular year. I was working in the research department of a media outlet, making documentary shows.

A colleague noted that his mum had inherited the ownership of a vacation unit in Spain and, after long-term use, had begun looking to exit the contract.

It's worth mentioning how common holiday ownership had evolved with UK travelers in the eighties and nineties.

Holiday ownership enabled people to use the same accommodation each season, or trade their time slots with other owners who had apartments in alternative destinations. Roughly 600,000 holiday enthusiasts seized that option.

The first timeshare rush was accompanied by a lot of reports about unscrupulous sellers deceptively promoting properties. They were regularly featured on consumer TV programmes.

The common timeshare contract bound owners for decades.

By 2016, those owners who had experienced their regular accommodation in the resort for 20 or 30 years were ageing, and a large proportion were looking to end their association to their holiday properties.

A number had declining mobility and couldn't get to their apartments. Others just thought they'd enjoyed sufficient use from them. And some had died, in frequent situations passing on their loved ones to take over the contracts - plus their annual payments and maintenance fees.

The Investigation Unfolds

And that's where the relative had been placed. She looked online for answers and found SMT, a enterprise whose website claimed to release her from her deal.

Yet, having submitted funds and booked a meeting with them, her loved ones became suspicious.

Subsequent checking revealed hundreds of people claiming they had submitted funds and achieved no result out of it. Actually, they had lost money. A lot of it.

Our team commenced probing what was going on. It was rapidly apparent that there were dubious individuals active in the holiday ownership market.

A legal professional had hundreds of individual complaints waiting to sue the company.

The team interviewed individuals who had used the firm and they each reported similar experiences. They thought the company would purchase their timeshare off them but when they participated in a session (for which they made an advance payment) they were told there was no potential buyers.

In place of that, they were persuaded - actually pressured - to commit further cash purchasing "the firm's incentive scheme", named after the outfit's parent company, the overarching entity.

The nature of these rewards was rather ambiguous. They appeared to be a form of credit, providing reduced-price holidays and services and shopping deals.

And they were reportedly "tradable" with fellow investors, at a future date.

Investing money up front now would lead to an eventual payoff that would offset the company's charges and allow the property owner in profit, freed at last from their pesky deal.

An unrealistic promise? Indeed, it was.

A 'Misleading Scam'

If these accounts were accurate, this was a massive scam.

The technique is termed a "misleading sales."

Someone - in this case the company - "baits" the consumer by marketing a particular product but then to state it cannot be provided, steering the customer to an alternative, lesser offering.

Such practices are unlawful. Possessing all the accounts we had gathered, we argued to secretly film one of the organization's sessions.

Such an operation demands dedication, work, and strong justifications for why this is the exclusive approach to obtain the information needed to prove wrongdoing.

Armed with that permission, our compact group organized a meeting with one of the firm's agents in the location.

Posing as a member of the public wanting to assist his parent free from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement